Bulletin Board

Q

I would just like to say what friendly web site you have. It gives an insight into a author that clearly cares about his fans. I very much enjoy your books no matter what the setting (but I would like to see some closure to Starbuck's story!). Thanks for the pleasure you have brought me on my 'sun and sand' holidays for many many years.
Steven Sharp


Q

Hi there. I'm fairly new to your novels, but a friend at school put me onto yours; I was in the library stuck for something to read when he passed me Sharpe's Eagle and I am now happy to say that over the last four months I have read five of your series. Your books really sparked my reading again, something my parents now call my 'unhealthy habit' as it often takes me into the early hours of the morning. Anyway, as well as being highly enjoyable, your novels helped me get through my last couple of history projects based on battles such as Waterloo and campaigns such as the Peninsular War(really it was just an excuse for me to keep reading!). Thank you so much for your writing and please keep writing for us misunderstood teen aged historians! Alyssa.


Q

Dear Bernard, I have strived to maintain your lifstyle by purchasing all your books over a number of years. I love Sharpe and The Saxon stories. My favourite is the Grail Quest, as I have an interest in the longbow and that period of history. I live near Towton in Yorkshire, site, as I am sure you know, of the greatest battle fought on English soil is the War of the Roses. This cries out for a book from you!! The story has all the elements that would make a cracking book, so come on, get the pad and pencil out and get going! More power to your pen, best wishes, Barry

A

Thanks Barry, but I'm afraid War of the Roses is not on my list.


Q

Hi Bernard Cornwell, I love reading your books although I read only Vagabond and now I'm reading Heretic. Anyway I love Thomas Vexille's adventures and he is now my hero (smile). Keep with your good job. >From your Brazilian fan, Pedro.


Q

Dear Mr Cornwell No need to respond but I would like to make a comment about the inevitable comparison between the Sharpe series and the Starbuck Chronicles. I'm a great fan of both but Richard Sharpe has never suffered defeat(possibly "Rifles" apart). Starbuck, by contrast, having hitched his wagon to the Southern Star, is doomed to ultimate capitulation. I imagine that the paradox that any writer who bases novels in the War between the States faces is that any discerning reader will have split sympathies. Admiration for the courageous, outnumbered, innovative but morally ambiguous South and the industrially and numerically superior, morally correct but initially incompetent North. I am looking forward to reading how you manage that in the subsequent Starbuck novels. In the meantime, thank you for two thoroughly entertaining and educational series. Keith Harris, Retford, NOTTS.


Q

Dear Mr Cornwell thank you for all the reading pleasure you have given me over the years. Regards Ken Davies


Q

To begin sir, applause. The Starbuck Chronicles simply have to be one of the best, and relatively unnoticed and wrongfully unrecognized fictional books about the civil war to date. Your research is spot on, the characters, good or bad, are always interesting and even the language, clothing and political points of view of the times are too accurate. Your truly bring this period to life with your work and I (although I'm sure you've heard this many times) can't wait for more. I was truly saddened to learn there was not a fifth book to be read. The story is simply inspiring. Take care and continue to create...Jeff Wahl


Q

Hi Bernard, I just want to say I've enjoyed all your books over the years. I first discovered your writings while reading a review of Wildtrack in Cruising World. This was back in 1988 and I still have a hard cover 1st edition on my shelf. Since then I've read every book you've published. Love Sharpe, can't wait for the next one, the Arthur books, took me a while to get into them, but finally read them all and really liked them and like I said, I've read everything you've written and have enjoyed every single one of them. I have just finished rereading Wildtrack, Killer Wake, Crackdown, Stormchild and Scoundrel. If you haven't guessed , I'm a sailor too. I have a 34ft. Hans Christian cutter. I know you are really into the historical stuff right now, but if you ever have some spare time I would like to read another one of your sailing thrillers someday. Pretty please. Thanks for the hours of enjoyment Carl P.S. Is Nick Sandman of Wildtrack any relation to Rider Sandman of Gallows Thief. Great, great, great grandson perhaps? Carl Dominello

A

No relation, I think I just like the name.


Q

Hi there from Brazil! My father gave me as a present a few books about the Anglo Saxons when I was a child, quite illustrated and well informed. I had always looked for the opportunity to reading historical novels about those times. Thank you for that! I have bought all the books of your Anglo Saxon stories. You seem to have a good understanding of both the 'Germanic world' and British history, which I appreciate. Congratulations and thank you! Cheers Jonathan Jacob, Brazil ps the Jacob family names come Germanic tribes who converted to Christianity in Germany, following the spread of Christianity, like you highlighted. ps2 I love the helmet from Sutton Hoo! It reminds of my father so much it is not even funny. ps Again, congratulations and thank you! Jonathan Jacob


Q

Dear Mr. Cornwell, Let me begin (as is always desirable) on a positive note by thanking you, most sincerely, for the many hours of pleasure and entertainment I have taken from your Sharpe novels. They are delightful. Unfortunately, I have just finished Sharpes Revenge and am compelled, yes compelled to say that I am seriously disappointed to read on your very own website that you &never intended it to happen! that you &introduced Lucille for Fredrickson&. Aunt Susan is distressed, indeed she is mystified that you should profess to be surprised by the actions of Lucille and Sharpe. Were you asleep when you wrote Madame Castineau? She is strong. She is sensible. She has a sense of humor. And yet she is still charmingly in need of rescue. In short, she is and probably always was, in spite of your protestations, written for Sharpe, who like Dorothy just wants to go home. To cut and paste her onto Sweet William was pure folly. Good God, Man! No wonder your plot went astray. Its no more than you deserve. To saddle William Fredickson with Lucille Castineau (and vice-versa) would be worse than cruel. We can only be grateful that she was wiser than you (and that silly ass Jane Gibbons) and did not marry the first man who came along with an offer to mend the roof. And poor Mr. Fredrickson! What, pray, has the gentleman done to you that you should undertake to torture him so? That you, who are ordinarily so astute, should attempt to bury him alive in the country with such and unsuitable woman. Shame on you. He wants to go to Rome. He is as well educated as any man in Wellingtons army, which one can only presume means Oxford or its equivalent (is there an equivalent?), and has a passion for ancient architecture. Yet now I learn that having pried him out of his smug misogynistic bachelorhood and robbed him of his friends you have exiled him to Canada! Please understand, Aunt Susan lives in the Great Pacific Northwest, as did no less than 5 generations of her family before her. No one is more enthusiastic about big trees and glaciers than she. But Heavens! The nearest ancient architecture is in the Yucatan. Harper, bless his heart, is entirely correct. It is not enough to put a woman in Fredricksons bed. You must provide a woman he can like. Madame Castineau, for all of her admirable qualities, is not a woman that William Fredrickson could make a friend of, and not having friendship to sustain them once the flesh has been enjoyed and they are left with nothing but a dry carcass, he would undoubtedly fall back on contempt. Certainly this would eventually destroy even the calmest of souls. Better to put bullets through both their hearts. Dear Sharpe has done them both a favor. Sir, please let me encourage you, should you ever attempt to storm this particular breach again, to re-visit your Shakespeare first. Do not attempt to harness Sweet William to Olivia. She will not do! Hitch him to Kate, or better yet, lock him in the barn with Beatrix. I will close by saying, that though, like many others, I grieve that Sweet William has rejected the friendship of Dick Sharpe and is thereby removed from our company, I am pleased that you did not chicken out as they say, and persist in a sad attempt to force a princess on The Poor Old Toad. Bless you. Aunt Susan approves, and has put Revenge near, although not at, the top of her Sharpe list, somewhere close behind Tiger, Triumph and Enemy. (She sincerely believes that General Nairns first interview with Sharpe in Enemy is a masterpiece.) Thank you again for all of the fun, Susan M. Lundstedt

P.S. It is too bad that Sweet William does seem to have sprung fully-formed from the head of Zeus. That is, that he arrived in our midst with all of his scars already in place and we did not have the pleasure of watching him acquire them one by one. I, for one, really do think we should actually witness him making one last sacrifice to the gods of war before he is consigned to happiness. Perhaps a, oh dear, no, mustnt make suggestions& P.P.S. If any of the above, that was written, I assure you, in a spirit of fun, constitutes some sort of suggestion that might cause you legal angst, please forgive me. I realize that it is very likely impractical, but should it concern you, please feel free to send me any kind of release that you think will be helpful, and I will read it, sign it, have it notarized and return it to you in partial payment for value already received.

A

Ah, poor 'Sweet William'; I should give him a better fate, shouldn't I? I'll get round to it one day . . . . .Thanks for your message!