Your Questions

Q

Bernard, the books are all great (although getting a tad predictable) and the weaving in to actual history is fantastic. I am writing to see if you are aware of the effect of your books on wargamers here in the UK. We read the books avidly and the Arthur series (my all time favourite) is now responsible for a Warhammer Historical supplement for which many manufacturers are now making figures. Have you ever tried Wargaming? Having read you family History recently (in the daily mail?) I to seem to have had a strange affinity with the North East of England although born and bred in East Anglia and in the last month my Niece has just found out I have a half sister I never knew about from Croft on Tees. Bit of a shock when you are 51 - Life is just as strange as fiction! Steve Wilson

A

Life is often stranger than fiction! We novelists struggle to keep up. I never have tried wargaming, this is partly to protect Sharpe's reputation . . imagine his horror as he loses to some 16 year old. No, think Sharpe had better stay well away...


Q

AHA!! Just saw in a genealogy that there was an Earl Uhtred of Northumbria, who married Elfgifu, the daughter of King Ethelred...could it be our Uhtred?? Fionna

A

It is! Or at least it's that family - which is my family - there was a whole succession of Uhtreds who were (mostly) Earls of Northumbria in the pre-Conquest era. The family still thrives, though now spells its name Oughtred and lives, mostly, in Yorkshire or British Columbia. I am a by-blow (they were always good at that).


Q

Dear Bernard, I enjoyed 'Gallows Thief' very much, and particularly the colourful and often bizarre vocabulary that your London characters used. I noticed (correct me if I'm wrong) that none of them referred to each other as 'mate', which contemporary Londoners seem to do all the time, taxi-drivers especially. Did that term of address not exist in Regency times? Sorry, this is not the most riveting of questions, but I am very much curious, and I wonder when did it ever creep into everyday use. Do you have any idea? Thank you. Paul Reid, County Cork.

A

The word enters the language very early - 14th Century - but its popularity seems to explode in the 19th (I'm deducing this from the citations in the OED). In Gallows Thief it's part of the 'Flash' language, which was the argot used by underworld London in the late 18th and early 19th centuries - a 'private' language so dense that some magistrate's courts employed translators. Many flash words crossed over into mainstream English, and I suspect mate was one of them . .in the jocular sense . . it already had a perfectly respectable existence as a naval rank, or to describe a wife or husband.


Q

I recently wrote you regarding how much I enjoyed your Saxon series. I have a quick question if you don't mind answering. While writing the books, did you find that you enjoyed writing Uhtred more when he was with the Danes or with the English? Or did you find no preference either way. I was just curious. Thanks again for all of your work. David Stackel

A

No preference. I just enjoy him! Probably enjoy him most when he's with Alfred because he really does not like him, but does have a curious admiration for him.


Q

I have enjoyed your Grail Quest books immensely, and I have especially enjoyed their accuracy. So I am a little surprised to find a mention of phlogeston, which I thought was seveteenth century invetion. Do you know something I don't? Please make you books longer. Ol Rappaport

A

You're absolutely right and I wish you hadn't told me that! I'd always assumed it went back to mediaeval alchemy and, on checking (several years too late) discover that it is 17th Century. Mea culpa. Thanks!


Q

Bernard, I am so thrilled to write you. You have become my favorite author. I have spent many days and nights the past two years reading everything that I can get my hands on. You have taught me more about the Napoleonic wars than a semester of history. I have just finished the Nathaniel Starbuck series and am reading Stephen Sears's book about Antietam. As I was reading the series it occurred to me that Colonel Lassan is indeed Richard Sharpe's son, you sly dog! It raises the question of how create your characters. You obviously created the son while you were developing the father, judging by the copyright dates. Does this mean that Starbuck will continue the war and when should we expect to be at Chancelorsville and into Gettysburg? I also wanted to ask you if you write your novels in the chronological order as they appear in the books or do you write as the thoughts occur and then edit later to give the sequence? Also do you ever tire of a character and decide to have them killed or removed? Is Hakeswell as beloved to you as say Adam Faulconer or even Sharpe and Starbuck? I will let you go before I take up too much of your time. I have Sharpe's Fury in the wings and am desperately looking for Sharpe's Revenge to see how Colonel Lassan was procreated. Best wishes and thank you for keeping me company, Rick Schatz

A

None of the above. I wish I had written them in chronological order, it would have made my life much easier! And killing characters if often a whim, which is sometimes reversed in the next draft. Depends on my mood. In this I am godlike, capricious and cruel (which explains my fondness for Hakeswill - no, I love him because he was such a useful character).


Q

Mr Cornwell, I would just like to say that i am a huge fan of your books, particularly the Warlord Chronicles and the Saxon Stories. Indeed, reading the Saxon Stories inspired me to select Alfred the Great and the Danish invasions for my A Level history coursework, a plan that was only stymied by the fact that my teachers' expertise did not lie in that area. I do, however, have a quick question. After reading the books my interest was piqued, so i did a little research of my own. One of the things i came across was that in the autumn of 892 or 893 the Danes, experiencing trouble in Europe, again attacked England, crossing in 330 ships, in two divisions. The larger body entrenched themselves at Appledore, Kent, while the smaller body, under a leader called Haesten, settled at Milton, Kent. Considering your intention to write 7 or 8 books i couldn't help wondering whether the Haesten whom Uhtred took from the Frisians might turn out to be this Haesten? A trivial question, i know, but one my curiosity is not allowing me to ignore. Thank you ever so much for the hours of pleasure your books have given and i wish you the best of luck (though you hardly need it!) with your future novels. With sincere thanks, Alasdair.

A

Looks very likely to me! Well anticipated!


Q

I have just finished "The Pale Horseman", and I did read "The Last Kingdom", and I wanted to let you know that I enjoyed them so much. I'm going out tomorrow to get "Lords of The North". I was thinking about starting the Sharpe books should I start with the 1st one? Keep up the great work. Tony Rivera

A

Yes Tony, I do generally recommend reading the Sharpe books in chronological order starting with Sharpe's Tiger. (You'll find the complete chronological listing on the Sharpe books page of this website).


Q

Hi Bernard was just wondering if you listen to music whilst you're writing and if you have any songs or pieces of music which remind you of any of your characters. I only ask this because I was listening to Tom Petty's Greatest Hits the other day and I remembered the first time I listened to that album I was reading Crackdown and the songs brought back really strong images from the book, especially my favorite character Maggot. I just thought this was a bit weird as I read that book 10 years ago and haven't read it since. Heather

A

I don't! I've tried, and find it distracting, so don't any more. Though sometimes, when I wrote the Arthur stories and wanted my blood stirred, I would put in a CD of a Welsh male voice choir - and tried to imagine the sound of an army singing before battle. Chills the blood as well as stirs it!


Q

Hi Bernard Cornwell! It's a pleasure to me to right to you. I've read many of your books and I'm particularly interested in the Chronicles of Arthur. I have to do a monograph to College and I've chosen this theme: the influence of the epoch in the writer's way to compose the character. So that I'd like to ask you if the epoch you wrote the books (the chronicles of Arthur) has influenced you to built the character of King Arthur. I would appreciate if you could send me an answer. Thanks a lot ! Alessandra Fagundes from Brazil

A

I think so! Though in some ways my Arthur was anachronistic (in my view) because he alone of all the characters in those books is not really beset by religion. He probably should have been. There is some evidence that Arthur was a pagan (which is why the early church disliked him), and so part of his character comes from the fight between Christianity and paganism. I suppose that I wanted to write a good man living in evil times! So perhaps he is not of his own era, but every era. I'm not sure human nature changes at all, while our circumstances do change drastically. I suppose the biggest influence of the era on the character is that the times in post-Roman Britain were so bad, so awful, that only a very good man could rise above them, and thus Arthur. I have a horrible feeling I'm not helping you at all.