Bernard, Since Sharpe and his green coated rifleman do so well at moderate range with the Baker Rifle, I was wondering how prevalent Rifle Regiments were in the British Army during the Napoleonic era. I seem to recall a few times when Sharpe and his troops were being over run by Frogs that they just spit unpatched balls down the barrell as fast as any Brown Bess could be loaded. The reason the US Continental Army of the period did not use rifles was the issue of loading speed. (3 x a minute with the Brown Bess versus once a minute with a clean Kentucky Long rifle) Your thoughts? Bob Long
Rifle regiments weren't over-prevalent - basically they were used in company sized packets to bolster the skirmish line. It was very rare for the rifles to fight in a battalion-sized unit, simply because, as you say, their slow reload rate would make them vulnerable. They could, of course, tap-load, but then they surrendered all the advantages of a rifle. Tap loading was fairly common - it was a very frequent vice of French skirmishers.
But once you 'salted' riflemen among musket-carrying skirmishers they were extraordinarily effective. The short-range muskets held off the enemy skirmishers while the rifles picked off prime targets - and the fact that the British persevered and expanded the rifle units during the wars demonstrated that some very hard-headed generals (Wellington) understood their value. I don't know (but ought to) what the proportion of rifles to muskets was in a skirmish line - that information might be in Mark Urban's excellent book, Rifles, but I'd guess it was around 15%?