Dear Mr. Cornwell, After reading the Grail Quest series and the Warlord series I was wondering why there is barely any mention of archers, or their effect in battle, in the Warlord series? It seems Thomas and his archers were invaluable against the French but Derfel and his men don't seem to consist of any archers at all. Any reason for this? Yours Sincerely, David Heaton
Because there isn't any real evidence that archers were much used in early mediaeval European warfare. We know that the huge warbow that will dominate the Hundred Years War existed (examples have been found in Britain from 2000 BC), but it was an incredibly difficult weapon to master and I suspect that very few men ever did - and those would have been the specialist hunters. Sometime around the end of the 13th Century it seems there was a craze in England and Wales for that long yew bow, and suddenly there were sufficient archers to make a battle-winning army. But they simply didn't exist before, and the shorter hunting bow did not have enough power to pierce whatever armour protection it came up against. So I've no doubt there were a few archers in those early armies (we know, for instance, that archers fought at Hastings), but they weren't equipped with the long bow - they had a shorter version with much less power, and it didn't make a real difference.