Dear Mr Cornwell
I recently purchased and read “Gallows Thief”. Thank you for this thoroughly interesting novel. I found the detail about early C19 life in London, including the use of the colourful ‘flash’ language, the cricket incidents and the misery of coach travel, to be fascinating and the descriptions of Old Bailey quite sobering.
Tom Keneally, the respected Australian author, noted in his book “The Commonwealth of Thieves” that the use of ‘flash’ was so prevalent amongst the convicts in the colony that, in early court proceeding, an interpreter was required.
I noted that, in the “Gallows Thief”, there are a couple of references to Australia. One reference is when Sandman is threating Meg with ‘A voyage to Australia and life in a penal settlement’. May I respectfully suggest that in 1817 the use of the word ‘Australia’ would not have been in common usage. Maybe either ‘Botany Bay’ or ‘New South Wales’ would have been used?
Matthew Flinders, the amazing English navigator and cartographer, in his 1814 ‘Voyage to Terra Australis’ suggests the name Australia. The first time that the name Australia appears to have been officially used was in a despatch to Lord Bathurst of 4 April 1817 in which Governor Lachlan Macquarie acknowledges the receipt of Matthew Flinders' charts of Australia. On 12 December 1817, Macquarie recommended to the Colonial Office that it be formally adopted. In 1824, the Admiralty agreed that the continent should be known officially as Australia. (Wikipedia)
I expect that, from time to time, you receive pedantic comments from readers about your books. As I have an interest in the exploration and early history of Australia, I tender this as my excuse for this message.
With apologies
Keith McLeod
You’re quite right! I think I got it wrong in one of the Sharpe books too,