Bernard,
I've enjoyed several of the Last Kingdom series while on holiday this week - thanks for some riveting reads! I especially enjoyed learning some of the ancient names of various towns and rivers that are familiar to me, but I was intrigued by Exeter - I'd always presumed that this was named for the Exe River, but your books show that the Ex- prefix was used for the town (as in Exancaester) while the river was called the Uisc at the time. Do you have any idea how this came to be? Was the river perhaps renamed for the town? Apologies - bit of a niche question, but I'm intrigued!
Ben
Oddly enough both names derive from the same source – a pre-Saxon (and pre-Roman) name – Uisc, or Iska, which was a British name probably meaning water (you can imagine some Roman or Saxon pointing to the river and asking a native Briton what the river was called and he, misunderstanding, just said ‘water!’. Early maps of Arabia’s empty quarter are smothered in names like ‘Wadi Why Ask Me’ or ‘I haven’t a clue). The names just evolved slightly differently, but in the end both ended up as Ex.