Dear Mr. Cornwell,
I’m reading your book, Azincourt, with enthusiasim.
As I’m also shooting longbow (modern), I’m interested in ancient technics. One detail in your book raised my interest. In the beginning, where Hook was trying to shoot Perrill, you write(page 4):
“His left thumb trapped the arrow, and his…”
Is this writing based on facts or is it part of writer’s freedom?
As far as I have understood, the arrow was kept on the left side of the bow and the thumb on the right side. So, if he really trapped the arrow with thumb, he must have kept the arrow on the right side of the bow. And if so, he must have kept the string with his thumb (with two fingers supporting) instead of two or three fingers (called “Mediterranean loose”). Even though the ancient archers did not know “Archers Paradox”, they quite surely were using two/tree fingers with arrow on left side and thumb style on right side of the bow. At least the best archers, like Hook.
In most competitions today, the rules only accept “Mediterranian” with explanations like “it belongs to tradition”. However, there are examples of very good and fast archers that are using thumb style and shooting right side of the bow. For example Kyodo achers and many horse riding archers use it. They also anchor below the ear, which at least modern longbow archers do not do. This is very interesting because by keeping the arrow on right side of the bow, the arrow and the aiming eye are in better line with the target.
So, it would be interesting to know, whether the ancient archers were using either or both styles, I think yes…but then the myth of cutting only two fingers should be questioned. They should also cut the thumb.
Mr. Cornwell, sorry for my long message, but I have no other reference for this “forgotten shooting style (thumb style)” than your fantastic book.
Best regards,
Jarkko Lehtinen