Dear Bernard
I have read most of your books including all the Sharpe novels. I think I'm addicted to them!
One thing has me puzzled - in Sharpe's Assassin Sharpe addresses Major Vincent as 'sir' when Sharpe is a colonel and therefore outranks a major. Why is this?
Best regards and thanks for the terrific stories.
Michael
Dear Mr Cornwell
I am of course eagerly awaiting the arrival of 'Sharpe's Command.' Although Sharpe is an invention, he is taken seriously and regarded with affection by his innumerable fans. I realise this may occasionally be irksome, but this must mean that Sharpe's creator has a responsibility to be consistent and credible in the way our hero is treated. It is, for example, strange that in 'Assassin' Lt Col Sharpe calls an officer junior to him 'Sir', while that officer responds to Sharpe as if he is indeed of superior rank. In 'Waterloo' you have Sharpe saying that as his rank of major is Brevet, his real rank is Lieutenant - despite the guaranteed promotion to Captain following Badajoz. (I might say that these disappointing errors are repeated in the TV series).
In the same spirit, it would be deeply satisfying if the several hints of a return to the Colours that you gave us in 'Assassin,' meant that after 'Command' we might expect to see Sharpe go on to achieve his richly deserved generalship.
Best wishes
David lovibond
Sharpe was being snippy, which he can be – and in the Rifles, of course, officers were not addressed as ‘sir’, but as Mister Whatever.