Dear Sir.
2 People whom I would have considered to be complete opposites have something in common that surprised me.
Some years ago Noel Gallagher (the main songwriter for Brit-Pop band Oasis) was on a chat show. The conversation went something along the lines of.....
(Jonathan Ross) "You've had a fantastic career and obviously your best work is What's The Story Morning Glory"
(Noel Gallagher) "NO! Definitely Maybe, is my best work, What's the Story Morning Glory, pays the bills!"
Then (here's why I say complete opposites) Mel Brooks in his commentary for Blazing Saddles said "30 years on even though I consider myself to have done much better pictures, through cinema, rentals and purchases, this film still pays the bills".
Now the reason I was initially surprised is because I would say those 2 pieces of work are probably the ones that most fans associate with the 2 creators/artists. As a creative genius yourself, can you actually relate to what those 2 gents say?
And if so, how would you measure what you consider to be your best work? Is it possible for somebody like yourself, who has done so much, to actually say? "Yes that was the very best I've ever done".
Forgive me because before I heard the 2 people I mentioned above say it, it had never occurred to me that you don't necessarily say "it made me the most money therefore that is the best I've produced.
I'd imagine it's difficult, if not impossible? I know from my point of view speaking as somebody who's had the good fortune to purchase Sharpe on numerous occasions for myself, my family and friends, I can read for example Sharpe's Gold, decide this is the best one in the series and then get totally bowled over by the next one in chronological order and decide that is the best (and so on as i continue reading). So as somebody who's done so much more I wouldn't even dream of asking you to give one piece and say "that's my best".
Lee
The next book is always the very best I’ve ever done! Truly! But I do have a fondness for the Arthurian trilogy . . . .