Dear Sir
Picking up on a point another fan made, how come Sharpe did not pursue his money through Jane instead of Rossendale? As that fan correctly pointed out, the law favoured the husband back in those days with regards to ownership of assets. Was it Rossendale's connections? I don't think it would've been drawing attention to the fact he'd become inexplicably rich, because that wealth was discovered in Sharpe's Revenge. Or was it as simple as could not afford the legal fees mixed with a deep disliking of Lawyers?
I think Cochrane giving him a chest of coins does make up for it, but I wonder if you put a poll on here asking how people felt about Jane stealing Sharpe's fortune and getting to keep it? I'd imagine it'd possibly reflect our sympathy for our hero.
Also, probably 8 times out of 10 invariably a person whom betrayed Sharpe, whether it was your intention or not usually got punished for that betrayal. Was Jane punished, when she lost Lord John? Or was that you highlighting how our heavies, lacked discipline? Or was the prospect of motherhood (particularly out of wedlock) Jane's penance? Because perhaps it's just me, but with or without Lord John, she did not strike me as the maternal type?!
Finally as I've not long just read the part where Rifleman Taylor boasts he could out-shoot Dan Hagman and as they never meet, who do you think would've won in a shoot off? Of course I'd like to think Hagman wins, but we don't always get what we want in life.
Lee