Hello there Bernard,
I have been a reader of your books for years now, first following Sharpe through Spain (you skipped my birth town San Sebastian, though, where the redcoats didn't behave so kindly after they won and would have only be fear to show their human nature and how they reacted after suffering so much to take the place, but I am digressing, sorry, didn't write to talk about Sharpe) and afterwards following the shield-walls. I had not read your the Arthur Books because that story has been told so many times in so many similar ways that I think many people of my generation has been oversaturated.
Still, I got into this web and I read it was your favorite work, so I went to Amazon and got them.
There are many things I have enjoyed in the reading, as usual, and things I have enjoyed less, as usual, I cannot but congratulate and thank you overall once again, but there are two things I would like to comment on, since this is a story you particularly care for.
This in not a trilogy. This is one single story I understand has been divided for commercial purposes only. I guess that is a free choice for both the writer and the editorial, but I think it is somehow a cheat. You cannot read just one part, you cannot alter the order. It is just a rouse to charge three times for one story. It is no doubt legal, but I don't think it is honest.
Nevertheless, knowing that beforehand I freely chose to buy the three books and found what I consider a mayor problem or concession in the quality of the story which is only at the service of this commercial division of the book. You repeat yourself a lot, explaining certain things that take place in previous parts to keep in the loop those people that are going to wait years before reading the succeeding ones. This is not only unnecessary for those of us who read the story straight away, it is annoying. We are not dumb, we remember. We do not need to be reminded of obvious important facts just because they happened in a previous part. Least of all, we don't need to be reminded twice, both in the second and in the third parts, of things that happen in the first.
I understand and can even share the idea of publishing one story in installments for those fans who cannot wait till the whole tale is written (though I am not one of them) and can understand those recapitulations, if there is a year or more between the publication of the parts, but after the whole story is published, it should have been rearranged in a single book and all those unneeded repetitions should be erased. Moreover if you have a special feeling to this story in particular.
Well, that is about it. Thank you for your patience and for your books.
Have a nice day,
Alberto Cobos
Eibar, Basque Country
Spain
It certainly wasn’t divided for commercial reasons! If it had been published as one book it would have been 1,260 pages with over 560,000 words, which is highly impractical! The series was always intended to be a trilogy, and that’s what happened. I’m sorry if you found it repetitious. Like any series that is published over years you do need to remind people of things, so I suppose that’s what annoyed you, and all I can do is say sorry. But given the chance I certainly wouldn’t change those reminders.