Dear Mr. Cornwell, At this moment in time, I'm researching and writing a dissertation for my third year history course at university. My dissertation is about Alfred the Great and the representation of him through different genres, over nearly four different centuries and why he suddenly declined, if not disappeared. And your books on the Anglo-Saxons are one of the many primary sources I'm studying. I was just wondering, if it is not too much trouble, as to why you choose to write about Alfred and the way you represent him, his reputation in your books and your overall view/opinion on him? I understand if you don't have time to reply, but do look forward in hearing from you. All the best Catherine Bate
The reason I chose to write about Alfred is because he begins and nurtures the process which culminates in the creation of England, and that's a story that deserves to be better known! His reputation? I think it's unassailable. He was a great man, a highly intelligent man, and a diligent worker - one of the greatest kings ever to rule in Britain, but I suspect the heroic picture of him (as represented by the statue in Winchester) is erroneous, mainly because I think Asser's life can be trusted (and yes, I know there's controversy about that). But Alfred was a chronically sick man whose primary taste is religious-studies, and so I believe his successes in war were brought about by intelligence rather than by brute strength. I'm sure you've read David Horspool's book 'Why Alfred Burned the Cakes' - it must cover much of the ground you're working on?