Your Questions

Q

Dear Bernard Loved the Fort thought it excellent.Wondered if you were tempted to write about McLean again he played a huge role in the 1775 siege of Quebec where he went up against Benedict Arnold and Dan Morgan are you tempted??? Yours sincerely Geraint

P.S Others have mentioned about Starbuck being on the losing side as opposed to Sharpe but Wellington did suffer his one and only defeat at Burgos and in Sharpe's Enemy Sharpe does (rather bitterly it seems) recall the siege so I wondered if you'll have Sharpe on the losing side for a change?

A

I'm not really tempted . . . . too many other books I need to write - though certainly the story of that rebel expedition is a magnificent tale of forlorn bravery . . . . maybe I will be tempted if I think about it.

I really don't know where the next Sharpe books will be set - but Burgos is a distinct possibility


Q

Dear Professor Cornwell, I'm a big fan of yours (standard e-mail beginning, I hope). I get more and more fascinated after each book of your I read. I'm now literally sunk in the Sharpe Novels, stuck in Trafalgar due to my lack in Ships knowledge. If you excuse me, I'll keep calling you professor, for I think your work belongs both to literature an history worlds. And that's why I entered in contact. I'm a history student in Juiz de Fora University, Brazil and I intend on doing some work regarding the values of historical novels to the worldwide historiography. Once a famous brazilian historian named Capistrano de Abreu wrote "The fiction writer creates, the true historian do not create but rewrite the history". Maybe you rewrite or even belong to a third category that Capistrano have not identified, the History Novelist, which gives history new colors to original drawings. If you have the time, I would like to know your judgement on that. Best Regards, Tiago Duque P.S.: Sorry for bad English

A

Historical novelists should be story-tellers first, and though we ought to be true to history we are also free to change it when changes are necessary to make the story work. Historians (real historians) don't have that duty or freedom. I think the job of an historical novelist is to attract people to history - the lure being a good story, the reward being a fascination with history itself. So I don't think we need add a third category . . . the fiction writer does create, and the historian records! There's some cross-over, I think. The best historical novels do record some very accurate history, while the best narrative historians can tell a fascinating story, but broadly de Abreu is right!


Q

I have just read a brief article about the Viking bodies dug up at Oxford, possibly from the St Brice's Day Massacre. Will Uhtred be around during that time? It sounds like a great, if gruesome, episode. Thanks again for all the enjoyment your writing has given, as well as being the impetus for Sean Bean in Rifleman uniform.

Sheila Churchhill

A

It sounds as if he was there, doesn't it? I'm not sure - I've just started the new Uhtred book and I'll bear this episode in mind - who knows?


Q

Mr. Cornwell, Like many, I gobble up your stories any time I see one, the Arthurian tales being my first and favorite, but I have such an appreciation for your prose and dialogue in all your stories. My question is about the arms used by your characters in the Sharpe and Starbuck stories. Have you personally fired the weapons mentioned like Sharpe's style rifle, the British musket, French carbines, or even Harper's 7 barreled naval gun? If so, do you have a favorite?

Ben

A

I've fired a Baker Rifle and a Brown Bess musket, and both kick like a mule. I haven't fired a Seven-Barrel gun and don't even know if there's one left in good-enough condition to fire - but if there was I value my right shoulder too much to try! The Baker would be my favourite.


Q

Hello again, I just came across something recently, and it made me wonder: was Teresa Moreno based on Francisco Abad Moreno, the Spanish guerrilla whose mother and brother were killed by the french? Sully

A

Not based on, no - though I guess her surname was borrowed.


Q

Dear Bernard Am in process of re-purchasing all of my Sharpe collection (the boss aka my missus lets me purchase one a month ha ha) and having just listened to Sharpe's Escape, it's got me wondering. What becomes of Jorge Vicente, Sarah Fry and Major Ferreira? Also as I'm now listening to Sharpe's Fury, I'm wondering do you have any particular fate in mind for Pumphrey in the future? Am I reading Sharpe wrong to suggest Sharpe would feel the situation between himself and his Lordship is left unresolved? Do you have scope to bring back any of the above characters? Or are there not too many Sharpe prequals possible to do so? I can't wait for the next Sharpe, is it still a long time in the future? Lee

Are you going to write any more sharpe books? If so what is it going to be called or is that a suprise?

Kathryn Richardson

A

It's entirely possible we may see one - or all! - of those characters again.

I'm not sure when I will write the next Sharpe book; and I won't know the title until the book is written!


Q

Mr. Cornwell - I've read nearly all your books and am currently working my way through the Sharpe series. Frequently you refer to Patrick Harper as a "giant of a man" (or some similar phrasing). One question for you - Does this indicate your personal opinion of someone who is 6'4" or are you reflecting what the characters in your story might think given that in the early 19th century the avg male height was around 5'6"? Just curious because I'm a bit over 6'4" and around 250 lbs but don't consider myself a "giant of a man".

Roman H

A

I read somewhere that the average height of an infantryman in Britain's army in the Napoleonic era was 5' 4" - I have NO idea if that was accurate (and I know that Scottish soldiers were generally reckoned to be taller), but certainly Harper would appear gigantic if he was a whole foot taller than the average.


Q

Dear Bernard, Can I start by saying what a big fan I am of your novels. My particular favourites have been the Arthur series. I grew up in rural Somerset so took great pleasure in your descriptions of the landscapes, I also very much enjoyed your take on the Arthur legend. I am currently reading the Saxon Stories, and have just started Sword Song which I am very much enjoying. I have the hard back version of Sword Song (ISBN 978-0-00-721971-1) my question or observation is in relation to the cover art work. It shows a stone bridge (collapsed in the middle) with soldiers surging on both sides, burning arrows over head and a castle in the back ground. Does this artwork depict a scene from the book? The castle in the background is stone built and looks fairly typical of castles across the British Isles, however it looks (to my very un-trained eye) that it is too advanced for the period? Uhtred says when discussing the buildings of London, that the Roman buildings were in ruins and that the Saxon city was built of thatch, wood and wattle. As the castle on the cover is not in ruin and does not appear to be Roman in design was this just a poor choice of art work on behalf of your publishers? (As I doubt you would make a historical error such as this). I realise this is quite a trivial thing but it has been nagging at me since the book arrived in the post. Many Thanks for your time, I await your reply, Charles

A

I don't have a copy of the book with me (I'm travelling), but there were, in effect, two Londons - the Saxon city of wood, wattle and thatch was built more or less where the Strand is now, while the Roman city, much decayed, was on the site of the present City of London (the financial centre around St Pauls), so the wall in the background would be the Roman wall which, while partly derelict and often repaired, was still there - likewise the bridge was Roman work. So I can't comment directly on your question (because I can't look at the cover), but the artist is certainly right in showing some stone fortifications and bridge piers.


Q

Dear Mr. Cornwell - Like many others, I have admired your writing for a dozen years, and have read most of your books. I do have a specific question - throughout the Anglo-Saxon book series you use the term "shilling" in money - indeed use it regularly. Am I wrong that actually the shilling did not arise until hundreds of years later, in the middle ages? I would be interested in your view.

Secondly, while NOT giving you a plot idea - I am hoping at some point you might turn your attention to the La Plata Expedition of 1807. Fascinating material, several interesting accounts by anonymous officers - plus things going wrong for the likes of Home-Popham and Craufurd. In fact the Buenos Aires attack seems like a classic urban warfare disaster - it could have been Falluja in Iraq. I live near St. Andrews, New Brunswick (Canada) and so "The Fort" is of special interest, as so many arrived here from Castine to rebuild their lives in 1783. Having also sailed into Castine in a small gaff-rigged sloop, and explored the details of some of the families that came from there, I especially enjoy it. And the house we live in was built by an Isaac Cook - who had been a soldier earlier in the Rev. War under PELEG WADSWORTH in Bailey's 23rd Mass. Regiment at the defence of NY, White Plains, and attack on Trenton in 1776. Your book helps Peleg come to life. The soldier Isaac Cook is my wife's 3greats grandfather. I also have an ancestor that was in the 88th Regiment (Connaught Rangers) in the La Plata Expedition and Peninsular War, so must say how much I enjoyed your Sharpe novels through the years. All the best in the future - Tom Moffatt

A

The word 'shilling' is an Anglo-Saxon word denoting a small value coin that was used in Wessex and Mercia - it's mentioned in a couple of surviving documents from the 8th Century onwards and, of course, it has very little to do with the shilling some of us grew up with!

La Plata is tempting . . . . I don't know, I've read a good deal, but it would need a lot more research. And I'm glad Peleg Wadsworth pleased you - I became ever more fond of him as I read his letters, and the many references to him in contemporary documents. He was, undoubtedly, a very good man indeed!


Q

I have happily read all your Sharps novels over the years and enjoyed the tv episodes,although they fail to match your level of authenticity. I have also read the first 2 Starbucks novels(the final 2 are on order). The Latest book I have read is Azincourt,witch I couldn't put down.I will now finish reading the starbuck chronicles before going onto the Anglo Saxon Chronicles,being a Celt I find ancient British history fascinating and look forward to reading all 5 books of the series. I have one question though,Is Nick Hook going to appear in any other stories,I know Agincourt was the last major action in the 100 years war and I do like your series. All the best your devoted Cornishman Lee

A

It's possible we may see Nick Hook again, but I'm not making any promises