Hello Mr Cornwell, just a few points. Firstly there are hopelessly few books of yours that I haven't read yet and I managed to find the first two Starbuck books in the "cheap" section of the local department store. It felt like sacrilege to buy them there but I couldn't help myself. Read the first so far and loved it but wondered if it was a tough choice to have the main character in southern colours given the outcome of the war and knowing that the cause is always going to have a negative end?
And I'm having a writing argument and who better to ask but, the point is; that if there is a smell of, or like "shit" in the air, ie from a sewer or the slicing of guts in battle, then it is fair to actually use the word for realism? Thanks for your time.
Adrian
It would be easy to write about a northerner fighting for the north, confident always in the righteousness of his cause, but to put a Yankee into the Confederacy? That is far more interesting, far more difficult; it gives him a moral dilemma he wouldn't face if he were a southerner fighting for the Union (though I won't deny he would have felt some tensions that way around). We now know with an absolute assurance that the cause for which they fought and died was wrong, but they didn't know that, and that's what makes them interesting.
Not only fair, but wise. Use it!