Your Questions

Q

Hello Mr Cornwell, I am a huge fan and have read almost all of your books. As an expat Brit living in the US, and having lived in Winchester and been a frequently visited the Greenjackets museum, I have a love of the SHARPE books. To save your readers unnecessary pain please make our year, one more Sharpe book! I'm sure that you are a little tired of that question but we really do love his character. Please dont make us wait years. Sincerely Andrew Pyke

Dear Mr. Cornwell... Do you have any plans of writing any further book in the series "The Saxon" stories". I'm so anxious to read, what happens next to Uhtred!! :) Thank you for the many hours of fantastic entertainment :) Tonni

Hi, the past few years I have been reading, and rereading, most of your works, and have been simply infatuated with them. My favorite of your books is Sword Song, in the Saxon Stories, and I was curious when the next book (after Burning Land) is set to come out. I have grown up with history, and the time around Alfred the Great had, until reading your books, not peaked my interest. Your books, being fiction, have also expanded my desire to learn more, and research the events and some of the people of your stories, so that I can have a greater perspective on the stories. Thank you for taking time out of your day to read and reply to your readers, it means a lot to us to hear from you. Sincerely, Andrew Pospisil, age 17

Hello, I've just finished your last novel of the Saxon series. I'm sad to say that I am addicted to them and I don't see any indication of the next book. Could you give me an indication of your next novel for this series? I have already read quite a few of your books including The Grail Quest, Arthur, Azincourt (which by the way was excellent), etc... Thank you.

Joseph

I have loved all your books and especially the Sharpe series. Are you planning any more of these? Thanks and best wishes Phil

A

Sorry to disappoint you Andrew, but I do think the next book I write will be Uhtred, hopefully ready for publication in 2011; so a new Sharpe is more than a year away.


Q

I have enjoyed the Sharpe series more than anything I have ever read. I shall look forward to your other works. Is Sharpe's Devil the last in the series??
Neal Parent

A

Sharpe's Devil is the last book in the series chronologically; but there will be more Sharpe books slotted in the existing books.


Q

I have written down a book that I thought I saw on your website. I was checking to see when it was coming out and now cannot find it. It was Captivate, Kill, or Destroy. I think it was about the American revolution? Did you stop this book or am I wrong about it? Please let me know because I have read all your books and was really looking forward to reading this new one. I have loved every book you have read. Started with Agincourt and have just finished off the Sharpe series to finish all your books. All I can say is I love you writing. The characters are so interesting. I love the time frame the books are set in. I would say that you are my favorite writer. Can't wait to hear from you and looking forward to what ever you write next.
Russell E. Duncan

A

Same book, different title. The book will now be called The Fort. Look for it to be released at the end of September. Hope you enjoy it!


Q

Hello Bernard! I read your previous posts and you said that Sharpe in the post-Napoleonic ages is quite a possibility, since you never state when Sharpe retires I think this will be an excellent idea! Perhaps the India, Afghan campaign? There's a lot of very interesting campaigns he can do, and I got a feeling his soldier spirit wouldn't be able to cope with retirement, ever. Perhaps you could bring back old unfinished enemies and friends alike in your new novels? I really enjoy your Sharpe books, but personally I believe he could use a change of scenery. The India novels to Copenhagen were a great change of backgrounds, and brought in new interesting facts from you.
Michael Sharpe

A

And I do think Sharpe is best when he's fighting the French - so I'll probably keep him in the pre 1815 time frame. I think he coped with retirement very well - he has Lucille? Lucky guy.


Q

How far ahead do you plan your books. Do you just think about the current book your writing or do you already have plans for the next one and the one after that. Do you make notes so if you're unable to finish a book, another author could finish it for you. (I'm thinking of the unfinished Hornblower and the crisis). Would you consider allowing another author to carry on your work. (In the way Eric Lustbader has taken over the Bourne novels). Sorry to ask questions to highlight your mortality but as a pragmatist I hoped you wouldn't be too offended. Daniel Taylor

A

I do have plans for about two books ahead . . . . and I read around the subject matter while I'm working on the current book . . . I'm looking about three books ahead right now. I do not make notes . . . . if I can't finish a book then it will stay unfinished! And I really don't want to have someone else write them for me . . . .it isn't that I think that's a dreadful idea, just wouldn't work for me! I'd have to spend so much time explaining what I wanted that I might as well write the book!


Q

I listened to your interview on NPR some months ago and enjoyed it tremendously. You are definitely was one of my favorites. I loved your Grail Quest series with Thomas of Hookton and have shared that particular series with a number of my friends who have gone on to purchase them. My true passion for your books is Nathaniel Starbuck. In your interview on NPR you eluded to the fact their is work in progress for a fifth book; Fredericksburg. Are there any updates? Keep writing and I will keep reading. I am currently beginning to Saxon Tales and, as expected, having a great time.

Matt Butow

A

I've done some of the research, but I'm not writing the next Starbuck now. My next book will be more of Uhtred.


Q

Hi again, Mr. Cornwell. Where do you think Sharpe would prefer to be buried: In a family plot on the Lassan farm alongside of Lucille, or in a military cemetery with the men of the 95th and the South Essex? Alan Kempner

A

Oh, I'm sure he'd like to be close to a woman through all eternity. He's no fool!


Q

Dear Mr. Cornwell: I recently started reading your Sharpe books--I started with "Sharpe's Rifles" and have read fourteen books in the series. I love Sharpe and Harper, love your writing, and can hardly believe I waited this long before trying your fiction. Sharpe is an exceedingly brave, loyal, self-made man, but what I love most about him is his chivalry towards women. Sharpe *likes* women. I don't mean he just likes having sex with women (although he clearly likes that just fine, too), I mean he genuinely enjoys them and sees them as people. I don't mean that he regards them as equals; I don't suppose he has ever thought about them in those terms. More like "vive le difference!" I'm sorry, I'm babbling--I could talk about Sharpe for hours. I'll get to the questions, and try to be succinct. First of all: we know that Sharpe's mother was a London whore, but what is the significance of saying she was a "Cat Lane" whore, as you have written several times? Was Cat Lane a notorious red light district in London? Or a slum? Would you consider altering the canon of Sharpe's background somewhat, by stating that his mother loved him? I know that Sharpe's miserable, Dickensian childhood helped make him the man that he became, but the thought that there was *no one* in his childhood who loved him and cared about his welfare saddens me greatly. It also strikes me as unrealistic. If there was no one at all in Sharpe's early years to love him and show him at least some kindness, IMHO he would have grown up to become a complete sociopath. Yes, he is a rogue, he has been a thief, he has committed murder (at least in the legal sense; so far as I've read, the men he has killed have either been on the battlefield, or else they thoroughly had it coming. Of course, the law doesn't regard the latter as an excuse.) But he is no sociopath. He can be amazingly kind and generous, particularly to women. He has compassion and empathy for the downtrodden. He is loyal to his men and to his friends. Unlike some officers who have not risen from the ranks, he doesn't order men flogged, or make their lives miserable, just because he can. He protects the weak and the helpless. He does his duty with incredible bravery. So, my reasoning goes, someone must have loved him, for him to have turned out so well in spite of everything. Considering his gallantry, that someone was most likely a woman. Maggie Joyce was kind to him, but he didn't even meet her until he was twelve. In "Sharpe's Havoc" you state; "[his mother] died without giving her only son a single caress." How would he know? Since she died in the Gordon Riots when Sharpe was only three, how would he remember that? You have indicated in other novels that he doesn't even remember what she looked like; he just has an impression of long dark hair. She died when he was too young to remember her, at least consciously. So, for the peace of mind of anxious fans like myself, who care almost as much about Richard Sharpe as if he were a real person, please alter your canon to state, or at least imply, that his mother loved him. Another question: was Sharpe's mother always a whore? My theory is that she could just as easily have been a nice, ordinary girl who was seduced, became pregnant, was dumped by her lover, disowned by her family, and ended up in a brothel, where she gave birth to Richard. If that was the case, she would be more likely to love her son than if she were just a whore who got careless. Next question: Sharpe has had a great many affairs in his life. Which women would you say influenced him the most? Which relationships were the most important? I would say: Grace, Teresa, and Lucille. I'm curious as to whether or not you agree. Each one of those three seems to have been what Sharpe needed at that point in his life. Now, as to Sharpe's father: I know that you aren't going to give your readers that answer anytime soon, but will you ever tell us? And was his father someone important or famous? Will Sharpe ever be reunited with Antonia? I know that the canon of your books differs somewhat from the canon of the films, but the very beginning of "Sharpe's Peril" shows Sharpe looking at a picture in a locket. The audience sees it only briefly, but it seems to be the portrait of a little girl. My belief is, that little girl is Antonia. I'm hoping that there will be one final movie in which he is finally reunited with her. I understand why Sharpe had to leave Antonia behind in the care of Teresa's relatives when Teresa died (plus, you had to use something as a plot device; it would have been hard to write further Sharpe books with Sharpe having a motherless child in tow). But I refuse to believe that he would just abandon her and never give her a second thought. My opinion of him would plummet if he did! Moreover, his line in the movie version, where he has just saved Teresa and their daughter from Hakeswill, the line in which he gasps; "She might never have known me," just breaks my heart, considering what happened later. I hope you will someday write a book in which the two of them are brought together again. Antonia can be a child, a teen, or a young woman--I'm not too picky. But please, if and when you write such a book, do *not* have her hate him, at least not by the end of the novel.. She might hate him or be angry with him at first, because we don't know what her mother's family might have been telling her over the years about her father. It didn't seem to me that Teresa's family was all that fond of Sharpe. In the movie (again, I know the movies differ from your books), Teresa's uncle refers to Antonia as the bastard child of an English soldier. This doesn't suggest that her mother's relatives would tell the little girl nice things about her father. They might even claim that Sharpe willingly abandoned her. Or, for all I know, the family might have told Antonia all about both of her parents, might even have been corresponding with Sharpe over the years, letting him know how his daughter is doing. In that, her childhood would not be so unusual--not so very different from the British custom of sending a child away to be educated. Or, Antonia might have been told very little about her father, might have gotten curious about him, and as a girl or a young woman, might decide to seek him out. Or she might be in some kind of trouble and Sharpe has to rescue her. (Although, if you go that route, please don't let her be some completely helpless female. I like the thought of Antonia being extraordinary, since both her parents were so remarkable.) There are a lot of ways you could do it, and I trust an author as talented as you are, Mr. Cornwell, to do it right. Would you please give us a *good* explanation as to why Sharpe, once he became involved with Lucille and they started living on the farm as husband and wife, never went back and got Antonia? (By a "good reason," I mean please don't say that he just didn't care enough about her to go back.) Granted, he might have reasoned that it would be bad for Antonia to be uprooted from the only family and country she had ever known. Moreover, having just hooked up with Lucille, and still being legally married to another woman, it would not have been an ideal time for Sharpe to say; "Stay here, love, I'm going to Spain to get my young daughter and bring her back for you to raise." (I may have just answered my own question.) Still, it might be something he has thought, or would think about, doing over time. Lucille does not strike me as a woman who would have a problem with the fact that Sharpe already had a child. Whatever his reasons, I don't believe Sharpe would ever just abandon his child. He knows firsthand how hard the world can be for orphans and abandoned children. That is why my opinion of him would hit rock-bottom if he never gave Antonia another thought, or never made any provision for her. One last family-oriented question: Did Patrick Harper and his wife ever have any children other than young Patrick? If you are still reading this really long message, Mr. Cornwell, I thank you for your patience and dedication to your fans. I will greatly appreciate any answer(s) you might give me. Thanks again for creating the wonderful, fascinating character of Richard Sharpe! Sincerely, Patricia Fogleman

A

Cat Lane was a slum . . . . .and not particularly notorious . .. there were a lot of slums and probably the most notorious was St Giles which is now the upscale area around the Seven Dials in Covent Garden. I do know because I invented Sharpe and his mother. And he had a lousy childhood but he got over it. His mother was a whore. Nothing wrong with that! She probably was a nice girl, I'd have liked her, but she was a whore because she had little choice. Grace, Teresa and Lucille, yes I would agree! Antonia won't hate Sharpe....I promise! No, Sharpe's father is not an historical figure. Patrick Harper and his wife? I think they had about ten children . . . . Thanks for all your comments!


Q

Hi Bernard, Can I firstly say I'm a big fan of your work and have just finished The Burning Land and look forward to the next story from Uhtred. I myself am from Canvey Island and went to college in Benfleet, so was wondering whether that's it for Uhtred now in the town? Or whether northward only for him? Also, in regards to the ships that were kept in Benfleet, how big were they, and how many? Seeing the creek today makes me find it hard to believe warships could fit there! whether the tide was in or not! unless the size of the creeks altered drastically in 1100 years? Thanks again for your incredible stories!
George Graham

A

I'm sure the creek has changed! The ships were found there, after all, so we know the Viking fleet made its way up the waterway between Canvey and Benfleet (and much of the fleet is probably still there). I'm no expert, but maybe when the Dutch specialists reclaimed Canvey (when? 16th, 17th centuries?) the creek was narrowed. And yes, Uhtred will be moving north, but who knows? He might have reason to return!


Q

Hi, I was wondering why the name ''Captivate, Kill and Destroy'' has been changed to ''The Fort'' if it was what the soliders used as a tactic??
Nathaniel Banks

A

The fiction buyer for America's biggest bookselling chain more or less demanded the shorter title and it was decided the title would be the same everywhere.