Your Questions

Q

Hello Bernard I've been reading your books for quite a few years and they served as a great source of entertainment to help alleviate the boredom of revision during my University years. I'd like to ask a few questions though. I apologise if they've been asked before. Which of your books are you personally most proud of?

Which of your books would you change if you could, there must be at least one book out there that you cringe slightly when recalling some passage or other. I've always found that I am my own greatest critic and would find it very hard to read something that I had written years later, so I wonder how you find such an experience. Finally, I've just finished reading for the first time the Starbuck Chronicles books up to The Bloody Ground and although it may simply be the novelty of them being the freshest of your novels in my mind I am utterly convinced that they are my favourite books of yours and have kindled in me a deep interest in the American Civil War. I feel you tend to write your characters so they fight for the side that you feel more attached to, or at least are more interested in. I also have an inkling that you have a soft spot for the Confederate States of America, I may of course be wrong and probably am! Anyway, thanks for writing the books that have given me so much enjoyment. Joe - England

A

Hard to say...I've always reckoned the Arthur trilogy are my favourite books - maybe because they were such a pleasure to write. But I find Uhtred is almost as much fun and I take huge pleasure from Sharpe...

Well, I certainly regret killing Obadiah Hakeswill - that was a daft thing to do, but other than that? I'm sure I would have regrets if I re-read the books (something I don't do), but I'm not aware of any real regrets other than not letting Hakeswill live to enliven Sharpe's later adventures.


Q

Dear Mr. Cornwell, I am a German reader and read 'Azincourt' latest. You have mentioned the quarrel whether longbows can hit high quality mail. John M. Coles: Experimental archaeology. Acad. Press, London 1979 offers a chapter on that with tests done over 100 years ago that showed impressively that longbow arrows can hit mail even at greater distance. I have enjoyed your book very much and am looking forward to read 'Burning Land'. Best regards Peter Ansorge

A

I do know of those tests . . . the problem being that no-one knows just how good the steel of the arrowheads was. We do know that as early as the 1340's there were complaints that bodkin arrowheads crumpled in contact with plate armour (they would shear through mail much more easily), but that was not every arrowhead - I don't know of any quality control applied to the forging of arrowheads - the manufacture of steel wasn't understood (the blacksmiths only knew to add carbon to the furnace and I suspect the quality varied enormously. Some arrows would undoubtedly pierce plate armour if they struck true and at short range, while others would crumple.


Q

I am so interested in your research for all your books, but especially the Sharpe series. I wonder do you ever check out the verbal battles on YouTube over tactics? I'm thinking about the postings that go along with the Battle of Waterloo video. The link to the first down load is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHgpq3YMY04. I know that topic is long ago in your writing career, but I wonder if you ever revisit earlier research? Or, after you have written about a topic are you so thoroughly sated with it that you have no desire to rehash it? I was reading some of the rather heated posts generated by that documentary, and began to wonder what you might think of all that "hooha." Mine is not a deep question that deserves your immediate attention, I was just wondering.
Jean Bryant

A

I confess I've never visited the website and, forgive me, I probably won't. I've studied Waterloo for years, walked the battlefield more times than I can count and read just about every book - and that's enough! I suspect my apprehension of the battle is fairly conventional . . . we know more or less what happened . . and I'm really not persuaded by recent conspiracy theories, and wondering what might have happened had Napoleon attempted an outflanking move or if Ney hadn't fooled himself into thinking that Wellington's right wing was in full retreat just goes nowhere. And, to be honest, I doubt I could change anyone's mind, so it would all be a fairly futile exercise!


Q

Hello Sir, I have read your novels ever since I was a young lad of 15 years old (now I'm 36). Have you ever considered talking to your publishers and seeing if some of your earlier books can be republished in hardcover. Perhaps as a omnibus. Both Alexander Kent and Tom Clancy have used this format. Perhaps a Sharpe omnibus or a general omnibus with a novel from each of the Sharpe, Starbuck and Saxon stories, etc.

I believe you have mentioned of doing another story with the backdrop of the American Revolution (enjoyed Redcoat)? Any plans for this book soon?

Have you ever considered writing about the League of Augsburg and Spanish Succession period? Cheers, Edward Whelan, Canada.

A

I haven't, but I'll mention it!

It is the next book I'll write.

The short answer is 'no'. The long answer is 'I'm sorry, no'.


Q

Dear Mr. Cornwell. I only just discovered, that a new book about Uhtred of Bebbenburg is on it`s way. I look forward to read it, as it is a fascinating story in every aspect, about my own ancestors the Danes. Such a long time has passed since "Swordsong" that I thought you had given in on writing, which would indeed be a great loss. I went through Azincourt in less than a week. To something completely different: Some time ago I attended a series of lectures about rewriting of history. It might sound trivial to you, but it was actually rather exciting. Questions like, if Gabriel Princip had missed the Austrian crown prince in Sarajevo, If Lee had not lost an important order at Antietam and so on. It actually touches some interesting aspects, for instance, had Varus won at Teutoburgerwald in 9, Denmark might be Catholic today and fanatic supporters of the EU. Not to mention if Bonnie Prince Charlie had overruled his own council and pressed south of Derby in December 1745, The Stuarts might be on the throne of England today? Please answer me soon best regards Preben

A

That can be fascinating . . . . and I confess I play the same game (though not in the books). I remember standing on the battlefield at Saratoga at the place where Benedict Arnold (commemorated there as the greatest soldier of the Revolution) captured the British battery and thus turned Burgoyne's flank and initiated the surrender, and thinking that if Arnold had failed then France would probably not have entered the Revolutionary War, and so would not have bankrupted themselves, and so avoided the French Revolution, and then no Napoleon, no Waterloo - all history changed on that New York field. But the path not taken? It's interesting . . . . but in the end it fades away into nothingness.


Q

Mr. Cornwell, I have seen many references to a scene in one of your books where Sharpe saved Wellington from enemy soldiers. I have not read that story. Can you tell me which book that story is in? I have loved to read the stories of Sharpe's adventures and those regarding early English history.

David Nelson

A

The book is Sharpe's Triumph.


Q

Hello from Poland, Will Azincourt be translated into Polish? Has any publisher bought copyrights for Polish market?

Marek

A

Yes, the book will be available in Polish translation is September of this year.


Q

I am in the middle of listening to your book, Agincourt, in audiobook form. It is wonderful! I have a question. Is the character of Sir John Cornwell an ancestor of yours?
Ron Abramson

A

Alas no . . . . . unless it was the wrong side of the blanket. He seems to have sired several bastards, but no legitimate issue.


Q

Mr. Cornwell, While I am living in Belgium I have had the wonderful opportunity to read many of your books, namely the Warlord Trilogy, the stories of Uhtred, and currently The Grail Quest. While reading in the Grail quest, book 2 "Vagabond", the narrator has your main character, Thomas of Hookton, remember hearing stories of an English archer from 200 years previous, named Robin Hood, or Hude, as you state in the book. It got me wondering how you would tell the story of Robin Hood. I no longer want the Hollywood version with Errol Flynn, and definitely not Kevin Costner (Shouldn't Robin Hood have at least a British accent?), that glamorise everything and make everything into a romantic love-fest. I do appreciate that your novels skip most of that and stick to the real, or real as possible, facts of battle and every day life. I would be interested to read your story of Robin Hood. Sincerely, Leland Dixon, a fan

A

I have considered Robin Hood, but it's not likely to happen any time soon.


Q

I heard you were coming to Brazil in September and speak at Rio's Book Biennial (Bienal do Livro). Is it true? If so, when exactly? Can I bring my edition of "The Enemy of God" for you to sign? Thank you for all the wonderful stories you told me - I hope you keep telling me more. Yours sincerely, Vitor.

A

Yes Vitor, I will be at the Bienal from 10 September - 12 September. We should have details for the Diary page of this website soon! And I will be happy to sign your book.