Mr. Cornwell, I have a quick and probably silly question for you. I have read many of your books including Sharpe and am currently reading Agincourt. It took roughly 20 seconds to load and fire a musket, but it takes a fraction of that to loose an arrow and the arrow seems just as (if not more) accurate. It seems like one could do more damage with a line of archers than a musket line. What is the factor I am overlooking?
Joe
Training . . . . you're right - the longbow had a greater range than the Napoleonic-era musket, was far more accurate, and had a hugely superior rate of fire. But - it took at least ten years to train a man to be an effective archer, partly because of the difficulty of aiming a bow drawn to the ear, and mostly because of the huge strength required to repeatedly draw a bowstring with a draw weight of 120 pounds plus. You could train a musketeer inside a week, but an archer? Wellington enquired (during the Peninsular War) about the possibility of raising a corps of longbowmen, but was told that the skill had died away - none were available.