I have read many of your books and I give you an applause for everyone. I recently finished the Saxon Stories. I am a writer myself and am working my own stories, though I find my youth and historical/geological ignorance problematic, and one name from your stories stood out to me. Roric Ragnarson. I was wondering, did you just make 'Roric' up, or does it have some sort of background?
Next, I would like to ask you about the Arthur Books. By the way I liked your disembowelment of the legends; you effectively turned frilly and gaily mystical into dark and realistic. Anyway, I know most authors and writer have strong underlying themes to their stories. I was wondering if you had any for the Arthur series, and if so, what were they? Also, I doubt you knew it when you wrote them in the nineties, but the Arthur books are a nearly perfect representation of the recent political happenings in the United States. Basically, one group trying to hold its position, while two separate factions of another group tear at each other while trying to take over. Your depiction of the Christian priests seems very reminiscent of the Media here as well. Here the Media has the power to sway millions of minds just by the information they choose to present. Christian priests always have had power over people because the religion has been so popular. In both instances the culprit (Media/ priests) have exercised the powers given to them by the people and not taken the responsibility to be completely truthful to the people. I was just wondering if this may have been the guidelines for some other allegory you where wishing to create.
Bryce Riddiough
I think I probably found the name in an index of a history of the period? That's the usual source . . .
I feel slightly ashamed about this . . . all I really did was set out to place the Arthur stories in a realistic sixth and early seventh century setting, and then got seduced by Merlin which meant that realism got stretched way beyond the bounds of believability. I certainly had no allegory in mind . . . the story was everything (it always is), but I like your comparison of the media to the priesthood. There's some nice mischief there.