Your Questions

Q

Would there ever be a possibility of a Sharpe game being made as I love the books and the TV series and think it would be a great addition to the series. regards, Sam

A

There's been talk of it...but nothing's seem to come of it yet.


Q

Dear Mr Cornwell, Can you tell me if there is any difference between the UK and US editions- besides cover art and such? Spelling differences I can live with but I've heard tell that some editors will make diction alterations for US editions. I'm particularly interested in the Warlord books. Thanks, Chris

A

No difference, except, as you pointed out, the cover art and the occasional spelling of a word or two.


Q

Hello Mr Cornwell, My husband loves the Sharpe series of books and films and is currently viewing the Sharpe's Peril film Can you please tell me if the book of Sharpe's Peril will be available soon? Thank you...Dot Tessier

A

There is no book for 'Sharpe's Peril'. The story was written for the film by a scriptwriter. Hope your husband will enjoy the film!


Q

As with all your previous books, I am eagerly looking forward to your next one Agincourt. However a question: why such a delay between the UK release and the US release? It always surprises me that the publisher seem to habitually release your new books just AFTER Christmas, when, at least to me, it would be a great gift to receive and one I would greatly appreciate. Neil Cosgrove

A

Publishers work in mysterious ways!


Q

I need your help on the British Armed forces, since I am creating an alternative History of a North America still part of British Empire and American revolt failed. The problem is how would the Army be structured in this timeframe this is were I need help, Now would this late 1939 army be like the Imperial British Army pre WW1, a late Victorian style? LW

A

Read the military histories of the time! There must be an Osprey book on the British army during the American Revolution, and Mark Urban's book, Fusiliers, will give you a clue or two. The army was nothing like the British Imperial army, you have to go deeper than that . . a simpler organisation. I'd recommend hunting the Osprey catalogue . . . always a good place to start.


Q

Bernard - thanks for the books it has provided so much enjoyment and historical knowledge over the years. Just one question however is in regard to your current book tour. When are you coming back to Scotland? I was disapointed that the current tour did not have an Edinburgh or Glasgow date. I previously attended a book signing and talk some years ago in Edinburgh. Ken Murphy

A

Sorry I didn't make it to Scotland this go-around. Maybe next time?


Q

Dear Mr Cornwell, I read your bulletin board today (25/10/08) and someone has asked for more news of Lucille. Hooray, I'm not alone in feeling that Sharpe deserves a "History". Why, as a hero did you not reward him with a Major or colonels pension instead of a run down farm that he could not afford to rejuvenate. Starbucks chronicle tells us that he died in 1860 and his son is in the french cavalry so why not a book about Patrick Lassan that could be set in the Crimean war in 1854, Sharpe would be 72 years old and could make a cameo appearance to explain his later years. P.S. On another web site (I forget which) a writer says that Jane Sharpe died in 1840 or 44 and that Sharpe married Lucille then, is this right? Love your books and speed to your pen. Mike Walker. Worcester, England

A

Whoever wrote that was making it up. I have no idea! In my mind Sharpe stays with Lucille to the end, but does he marry her? I honestly don't know yet.


Q

Hey, hope you are well Two very petty questions but was just wondering... Firstly, why do the majority of your novels contain no heavy swear words, especially the 'f' one? This doesn't detract at all, just pure curiosity considering they must have been ubiquitous in a soldier's vocabulary and, what with the graphic battle scenes and frequent violent death, it's not as if there can be a vast under 11 crowd to risk alienating. And secondly, do you conform to that saying about being your own harshest critic or are you fairly easy-going about your novels? Oh, and have you re-read Sharpe's Eagle yet? (Sorry, that's three) Thanks for taking the time and good luck with the writing. Max

A

I guess I avoid the efficacious word simply because it offends too many people (not me), and why offend unnecessarily? I think I'm my own most perspicacious critic, but I'm sure that's true of most writers. Third answer? No!


Q

Dear Bernard Being an avid fan of yours for some time, I always keep an eye on what questions people have asked, and I have noticed how you regretted killing of Hakeswill, Because you really seemed to enjoy writing his cruelties. I also know how you don't wish to take Sharpe back in time, but if you wanted to have fun writing Hakeswill again you could always take Sharpe back to when they first met. I also wanted to say how in the Arthur Books you left some questions unanswered, I don't really want to know what happened to Arthur or Nimue, because if I do find out it would take away the magic of guessing and fantasizing. I suppose in the same respect I really don't want to know what happened in the dark ages, because I like believe your stories are what happened, since the characters were all so lovable, hateable and real seeming. Also, is the Main Character in Redcoat Sharpe's Father? Kind Regards, never stop writing. Damien

A

No! He is not!


Q

Hi Bernard, Thanks for the excellent talk at Cheltenham last week. Currently reading Azincourt and loving every minute of it. Came across a few websites today while reading up on a few facts concerning Azincourt and thought you might be interested if you haven't came across the story yourself, I would also be interested to hear your views. It concerns a French history conference saying that the whole story of the battle as we know it is total lies, and one historian is quoted as saying: 'It is the result of deliberate myth-making by Shakespeare in his Henry V, perpetuated to this day by authors such as Bernard Cornwell whose best-selling novel Azincourt is a gripping, galloping, gore-filled celebration of the English underdog.' The web address in case you want the whole story is: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/10/27/do2704.xml. Scotland on Sunday is also running the story at: http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/uk/Academics-challenge-39myth39-of-Agincourt.4630335.jp, as I assume are many other news sites. Andrew Moore

Dear Bernard It was reported in last weekends papers that the French were holding a conference to discuss Agincourt, the main theme being that the English were not as outnumbered as is popularly claimed, that they resorted to underhand tricks to win the day and that their actions could, in retrospect, be described as those of war criminals. You were loosely quoted in the article. Do you subscribe to the French view that the victory was overplayed by the English or is this just a piece of wishful revisionism by the cheese eating surrender monkeys? Regards, Chris Poulton

A

Thanks! There's not a lot to say . . . . we have accounts of the battle that long predate Shakespeare, and they all more or less tell the same story. I'm really not sure what point the French are making (and suspect there's been a good deal of journalistic licence in the reporting). A revisionist view tries to claim that the disparity of numbers was very slight, but the argument is unconvincing. I suppose the main French gripe is over the slaughter of the prisoners, but no one at the time thought this was an act of great evil, but rather a necessary precaution. If the whole story of the battle is a lie (one that was started by eye-witnesses from both sides) then what on earth did happen? I'd love to know!