Dear Mr. Cornwell. I have read quite a few of your books and seen the BBC series, and consider myself a fan. One thing irked me however, your portrayal of Tippoo Sultan, which I thought was quite racist. I don't mind people like Hakeswill making racist comments and all, but when the hero of the book speaks in such a way about India's first freedom fighter, then it feels as if something is wrong. I know History is for the victors to write and all that, but it would have been nice to have a more accurate portrayal of India's Hero. I was wondering whether during your research for the India campaign you read anything written by eastern historians, or whether you relied completely on the texts of western historian? Still a fan, Omer.
I'm truly sorry, but your comments, implying racism, are offensive to me. Sharpe is supposed to reflect 21st Century ideas? And you truly believe the Tippoo Sultan was 'India's first freedom fighter'? Believe that and you can believe anything. It's true that subsequent Indian historians have tried to elevate the Tippoo into something that he was not; I was even assured by one educated Indian that the Tippoo had never been a Muslim. To repeat what I said in the Historical Note to Sharpe's Tiger, the Tippoo fought to impose Mysorean domination over his neighbouring states, which is not the same thing as Indian Independence . . . rather more a reversion to the Moghul domination (and the Tippoo, remember, was not only a Muslim, but favoured the Persian language). And yes, I read eastern historians, and talked to them, and spent a long time in Mysore. As to the idea that Sharpe has some duty to your sensibilities . . . he does not, should not and will not.