As with most people today I have a long commute to and from work, so as a bright idea I have started listening to books on CD's. The one I just finished was "An Archers Tale" I have to admit I put it on my list because I enjoy historical novels (both fiction and book on real people and events) and the pickings can be slim so the title and the write up on it prompted me to order it. I can say I loved "An Archers Tale". It stayed out of the trap most historical fiction falls into and that is skewing events to suite the hero instead of fitting the hero into the event or flat out making events up. I was particularly pleased to see that you used Crecy instead of Agincourt (as seems to be the habit when a 100 years war battle is needed), especially since Crecy was won by English archers and was a far more important battle then Agincourt was in the scheme of things (I will leave the points to that statement out since it can be lengthy). I guess if Shakespeare had also written Edward the 3rd as well as Henry the 5th Crecy might be well known too. You also did a great job of depicting daily life in the 14th century. Finally I loved the Cathars being slipped in there, that was great, instead of using the tried and often used Knights Templar and you put the Cathars in the right place, southern France by the Basques. I understand the Cathars still hold sway down there to this day. I look forward to reading the other 2 books in the series. Thank you for a historical fiction novel that is just that historical. I was curious though did any one claim to have St. Georges lance or was that a plot device? Shane Hunter
St George's lance was entirely fictional . . . is it true that Catharism persists in that area? How splendid! The Pope declared a Crusade against the Cathars, as I'm sure you know, and when a knight asked the papal legate how to distinguish heretical Cathars from good Catholics he was famously told 'kill them all, God will know the difference.'